Awakening 2e Errata [Mage: The Awakening]

Awakening 2 Slider

Hello, faithful readers!

 

We are now done with the errata pass on Mage: The Awakening second edition. The book now needs to be corrected, relaid-out, and sent to a professional indexer before the print on demand option goes live on DriveThru.

While the majority of errata were typos, visual glitches, and the like, the changes do include some mechanical changes. So as to not leave Mage troupes hanging, I’ve summarized those in a document linked to here.

Awakening 2e Mechanical Errata.

 

Thanks, and I’ll see any of you coming to GenCon at the con!


Posted

in

by

Comments

8 responses to “Awakening 2e Errata [Mage: The Awakening]”

  1. Wildeyes Avatar
    Wildeyes

    I dig a lot of these changes. Especially the clarification on legacy attainments not causing quiescence. It opens up a lot of story possibilities.

  2. YOLF Avatar
    YOLF

    There is so much to love in these errata.

    First and foremost how the 1e-ism of “all damage spells are fraying/unraveling because they’re attacking /with/ the domain of the Arcanum, even when it plainly doesn’t make sense with how it works elsewhere” has finally been shed for good.

    But there are also a great deal of clarification and standardization changes that tighten up spellcasting wonderfully.

  3. Axel Avatar
    Axel

    Can we get a quick clarification? It says that Legacy attainments do not count as obvious magic to Sleepers. Because of awkward wording, that could mean that it doesn’t count as Obvious in the sense of risking Paradox, or that it doesn’t cause Sleepers to suffer an Integrity breaking point for being obvious magic.

    I presume the former, but… Worth asking.

    1. Ephsy Avatar
      Ephsy

      It’s all of that. Free from the lie.

  4. Octavo Avatar
    Octavo

    Thank you so much for separating out the mechanical changes like this! Most of these clarifications and changes look great.

  5. Corwyn-Ulhar Avatar
    Corwyn-Ulhar

    One Proximus question: What do they do if a Blessing calls for a Clash of Wills? They’ve neither any Arcana ratings nor a Gnosis, so do they just auto-fail or roll a Chance Die?

  6. The Nate Avatar
    The Nate

    Note to layout: Mind moving the description of Aspirations to a point *before* they are referenced by Obsessions? This would make reading the book a bit more straight forward.

  7. Thorbes Avatar
    Thorbes

    With this errata, Mage: the Awakening is finally everything I ever wanted it to be. Kudos to Brookshaw and all his awesome team for making all the potential of this incredible game a reality. I know we have not been the easiest fandom to deal with, and for that I’m sorry. Keep up the good work!